@article {f9f252352f7c45cba751827c7d52d1b0,
	title = {A Question of Priority: Revisiting the Bh{\={a}}maha-Daṇḍin Debate},
	journal = {Journal of Indian Philosophy},
	volume = {40},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {67{\textendash}118},
	publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
	abstract = {As has been obvious to anyone who has looked at them, there is a special relationship between the two earliest extant works on Sanskrit poetics: Bh{\={a}}maha{\textquoteright}s K{\={a}}vy{\={a}}laṃk{\={a}}ra (Ornamenting Poetry) and Daṇḍin{\textquoteright}s K{\={a}}vy{\={a}}dar{\'s}a (The Mirror of Poetry). The two not only share an analytical framework and many aspects of their organization but also often employ the selfsame language and imagery when they are defining and exemplifying what is by and large a shared repertoire of literary devices. In addition, they also betray highly specific disagreements regarding the nature and aesthetic value of a set of literary phenomena. It has thus long been clear to Indologists that the two are in conversation with one another, but the nature of the conversation and its directionality have never been determined: Was Bh{\={a}}maha responding to Daṇḍin{\textquoteright}s K{\={a}}vy{\={a}}dar{\'s}a? Was Daṇḍin making a rejoinder to Bh{\={a}}maha{\textquoteright}s K{\={a}}vy{\={a}}laṃk{\={a}}ra? Were the two authors contemporaries who directly interacted with one another? Or was their interaction indirect and mediated through other texts that are no longer extant? Determining the nature of the interrelations between the two authors and their texts may teach us a great deal about the origins of Sanskrit poetics, the direction in which it developed during its formative period, and the way in which some of the disagreements between Daṇḍin and Bh{\={a}}maha metamorphosed in later time. By reviewing existing scholarship, considering new evidence, and taking a fresh look at some of the passages that have long stood at the center of this debate, this article sets out to answer the question of the texts{\textquoteright} relationship and relative chronology.},
	keywords = {Alamdot belowk{\={a}}ra{\'s}{\={a}}stra, Bh{\={a}}maha, Dandot belowddot belowin},
	issn = {0022-1791},
	doi = {10.1007/s10781-011-9128-x},
	author = {Yigal Bronner}
}
